Accommodating individual differences Free quick chat with naked women
Some may be working independently, while others are engaged in learning with their peers, and still others are being introduced to new subject matter by the teacher.
Low-achieving students will receive more guidance and structured support from teachers than high-achieving students, who are more capable of working on their own.
With less demanding curricula, lower instructional quality, lower expectations, and fewer resources, lower tracks provide less opportunity to learn.
Even more alarming, the assignment to a given track is often biased by race or social class.
So tracking is hardly an ideal solution for dealing with student heterogeneity. Policymakers and researchers are beginning to recognize that the success of a school system is determined less by its structure or institutional arrangements – such as tracking – than by what actually happens in the classroom.
In recent years, more and more policymakers have been urging schools to personalize learning, individualize instruction and adapt teaching to students’ needs in heterogeneous classrooms.
After assessing students’ strengths and weaknesses, teachers capitalize on strengths and compensate for weaknesses, with the ultimate goal of teaching students to become self-regulated learners.Based on the concept of visual momentum, two changes to the old interface were proposed in an attempt to accommodate the individual differences in task performance.The changes consisted of a partial map of the hierarchy and an analogue indicator of current file position.While adaptive teaching certainly seems promising, it is imperative to identify the conditions under which it is likely to be effective.Because adaptive teaching is still relatively uncommon, it has been difficult to conduct systematic observations.